WW2 Decoy sites

03 Feb 2010 10:18 #51 by Able Mabel
Replied by Able Mabel on topic WW2 Decoy sites
Myself and a fellow ARG member, Milan, visited several airfield sites in Norfolk and came acros one particular Q-site, (sadly i cannot remember its location), but several photographs were taken.
Also along our tour we came across an aviaition museum sporting this little 'gem' as well as a series of photographs and a writen description of its use ...

Attached files [IMG]/community/38893=1106-Q Site.jpg[/img]

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

03 Feb 2010 19:25 #52 by Ossington_2008
Replied by Ossington_2008 on topic WW2 Decoy sites
Fulmodestone! TG01431 30224
If I can get this link to work, it should be
here

if it don't work, at least you have a grid ref to go on! Explorers: once you know where it is, it's easy to park on the road verge and get to it without wandering across neighbouring fields like we did.
Excellent mini display of local decoy history at the Norfolk & Suffolk Aviation Museum, Flixton.
BTW readers, Ian isn't a tranny (well, not as far as I know, anyway) Abel Mabel has a 100sqn link!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

22 Feb 2010 11:08 #53 by outkast
Replied by outkast on topic WW2 Decoy sites
Bulphan decoy site, sitting just east of laindon in essex this was the decoy site for RAF hornchurch.

Both bunkers remain, one above ground and one below, these were parcticaly indentical to the ones at Nazeing, unfortunately access to the interior of both biulding was impossible, the above ground biulding is being used by the model flying club wich use the land and is locked tight and the underground biulding is flooded and full of rubbish.

gs169.photobucket.com/groups/u234/NK6ESLEMFZ/

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

23 Jul 2010 14:30 #54 by Hal_Chase
Replied by Hal_Chase on topic WW2 Decoy sites
Hi,
Is this a Starfish Decoy Control Bunker or a WW2 Royal Observer Corps Observation Post please?

tocsinbang.blogspot.com/2010/07/market-d...l-observer-post.html

Its in Market Deeping next to the ROC Post 52.660140 -0.313419

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

23 Jul 2010 15:45 #55 by Paul Francis
Replied by Paul Francis on topic WW2 Decoy sites
Definately a Starfish or other type decoy site control bunker - though it does more resemble a Starfish than anything else. (Edit)

You can tell a builder from an archaeologist by the size of his trowel. Mine is a small one!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

23 Jul 2010 15:57 #56 by Hal_Chase
Replied by Hal_Chase on topic WW2 Decoy sites

Definately a Starfish control bunker


Thanks, any idea where for? Would it be Wittering? That seems quite a long way from here though.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

23 Jul 2010 17:31 #57 by tarkey
Replied by tarkey on topic WW2 Decoy sites
At a talk about Decoy sites at Martlesham the speaker mentioned Honington. It was a decoy site untill Lord Haw Haw announced one night "we know about Honington being a decoy site ". It was then made into a proper site and left alone by the Germans.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

23 Jul 2010 18:09 #58 by Brothmark
Replied by Brothmark on topic WW2 Decoy sites
It is briefed Lakenheath that the base was a decoy for Mildenhall untill they decided to open it was a base.

8th Air Force Home Page mighty8thaf.preller.us/

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

23 Jul 2010 18:18 #59 by carnaby
Replied by carnaby on topic WW2 Decoy sites

Would it be Wittering?

Dobinson states Wittering had two decoys:
Maxey: Q site, TF143077, HERE
Alwalton: Q/K, TL152949, HERE
The first is your site, regarding the second I wonder if the residents of Peterborough know they were potential bomb fodder.

Edit - I take that remark back, as a glance at the 1940 map reveals very open countryside, though it does show what we are doing to this country, as only this week plans have been announced to (hopefully!) demolish the bowling and tennis club buildings on common land adjacent to my area to build yet another housing development.

Graham

Plan A is always more effective when the problem you are working on understands that Plan B will involve the use of dynamite :twisted:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

25 Jul 2010 00:14 #60 by the_historian
Replied by the_historian on topic WW2 Decoy sites
Don't know about that bunker being a decoy; there's an identical one near Dunfermline town centre.
That's listed as an ARP Control/reporting centre, I think.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.051 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum

We use cookies to improve our website and your experience when using it. Cookies used for the essential operation of this site have already been set. By continuing to use this site you are agreeing to this. To find out more about the cookies we use and how to delete them, see our privacy policy.

  
EU Cookie Directive Module Information